NME Reviews

Duffy

Rockferry

On the ocean-eyed, luscious-lipped, porcelain-cheeked, paper-white face of it, Welsh songstress Duffy is perfect. To start with, her story’s sweet. Now 23, she grew up in remote north Wales, listening to her mother’s modest record collection, smoking in garden sheds and telling ghost stories. Through that inherited, meagre library – and the blessing of tonsils the size of Cadillac hub-caps – she taught herself to sing. By 19, she was discovered by 60Ft Dolls’ Richard Parfitt, who brought her to the attention of Jeanette Lee (once of PiL) at Rough Trade, who hooked her up with Bernard Butler (Suede), Steve Booker and Jimmy Hogarth, who ‘helped’ write this album. It’s a lovely tale, featuring a vulnerable star with a cute nose. However, as everyone from Let’s Wrestle to Girls Aloud will tell you: actually, ‘perfect’ blows.

We realised this last December, as a pair of hollow pupils stared through a camera lens and into the homes of a million Chardonnay drinkers. The occasion was Duffy duetting with Eddie Floyd, as Sir Paul McCartney watched, on Jools Holland’s Hootenanny. Disturbingly, she didn’t look surprised to be there. She didn’t look delighted. In fact, she looked like a science museum exhibit with a robotic grin; no less a product than Will Young or a Dairylea Dunker.

Y’see there’s not much difference between Duffy and Leona Lewis. The tone of ‘Rockferry’ is that of an X Factor covers record: an LP for people who think leaving the washing-up until the morning is living dangerously. Duffy’s debut is hoovered of personality, principally, because on this evidence, she hasn’t got any. Oh but she’s got a spectacular voice they all say – and it’s true, her staccato whisper glides and climbs like Diana Ross riding a pony made of caramel – but it still sounds like she lent her pipes to someone else’s record.

‘Rockferry’ does have its merits: it’s over in the time it takes for three school runs and it certainly sounds expensive (we presume it was recorded in a platinum-plated studio with caviar chandeliers). For the most part, though, it’s Duffy merely parroting her carefully selected peers. She does it proficiently: for ‘Rockferry’, see Dusty Springfield. On ‘Warwick Avenue’ it’s Mary J Blige. The single ‘Mercy’, with its Austin Powers’ organ? Why, Aretha Franklin. You get the idea.

It’s a record without a blemish, a thoughtful tribute timeline to the great female singers of the past. Plump, well-formed like a Christmas turkey primed for slaughter, but tellingly, without any glimpse of Duffy’s real soul, no hint of her heart. So where do you go from perfect? Honestly, there’s no route out.

Greg Cochrane

4 out of 10

Comments (19)

Add a comment

CIARA# 

Mar 3, 2008

very good, she has a natural sound, loved it because its different

alabastercodify 

Mar 4, 2008

Music doesn't always have to be 'dangerous' you know. And 'dangerous' sounding music can be as derivative and uninspired as anything by Leona Lewis.

It's quite sad that these days you have to be a bunch of irritating, talentless half-wits like the Arctic Monkeys to get a decent album review in the NME.

Still, I'm sure Duffy will console herself that most people will love her album and couldn't care less if she sounds a bit like she's from the 60s, and if some tosser like Greg Cochrane doesn't get it then never mind.

For the record, you don't have to limit yourself to one genre or type of music. My copy of Rockferry will sit very happily next to albums by Nina Simone, Betty Swanne, Public Enemy, NWA, Greydon Square, The Smiths, the Stone Roses,and Basement Jaxx.

Remember Greg, variety is the spice of life. Go and listen to your white-boy indie rock crap that sounds like it could have been made anytime in the last 25 years and continue being dull.

Reddening 

Mar 5, 2008

hear hear! Alabastercodify you are spot on !

horra379 

Mar 6, 2008

Poor Greg. x

Chris Nicks 

Mar 6, 2008

This review nails it. Bland bland bland... dunno why NME even reviewd it... stick to music that moves and inspires, not the latest production line crap with about as much true soul as the last McFly album.

AdamShanklyUK 

Mar 6, 2008

The song Rockferry is absolutely brilliant. This girl is brilliant. So what if she sounds like she's from the sixties, the sixties music is GREAT. Arctic Monkeys aren't doing anything dangerous, pioneering or influential so I can't see why they get the good reviews. It's a great album, and every other reviewer agrees. I'm off for a sandwich now.

donnymfc 

Mar 6, 2008

Sigh. Another NME columnist hating something that is popular.
Hey, the record doesnt reinvent the wheel, but most of the best tunes dont. She has a top voice, girls want to be her and guys want to shag her. Im sure her careers over now this hack has tore into her.

numberonestrokesfan 

Mar 8, 2008

what do the arctic monkeys have anything to do with this? everytime people just slate the arctic monkeys because they are popular and just win a shitload of awards (which i don't think they deserved this year). anywhoo, it was pretty average especially after hearing "rockferry", i was expecting a little more "girth" and btw arctic monkeys are pioneering cos i can't think of a band who changed their style so dramatically from "whatever..." to "Favourite worst nightmare" and still managed to pull off

AdamShanklyUK 

Mar 9, 2008

"people just slate the arctic monkeys because they are popular..." I couldn't care less if they're popular or not, it's a case of whether they're good or not, which they are but by no means exceptional. The only reason they're hyped is because there's so much shite music being made at the moment. By the way, pioneering as in they "changed their style so dramatically from debut to second album" is the most ridiculous comment possibly of all time about anything. Number one, it's not pioneering at all and number two, they haven't changed style "dramatically". Anyone with two normal ears can here that. Next you'll be saying Joe Lean and the Jing Jang Jong are innovators... oh no, I think you believe it!

joeld 

Mar 10, 2008

Alabastercodify is right but Arctic monkeys are a bad example they have attitude and are the best of a bad/average bunch. It's the Pigeon Detectives/wombats/Kaisers of this world that the NME laud that we need to worry about.

MrMuggles 

Mar 16, 2008

For one thing this girl entered an X-Factor style show and did bloody well for herself. I'm so pleased that we have a talented person out there who sings Jazzy songs that doesn't get involved in rehab. She deserves everything really, she's my own version of Dusty Springfield, i was never old enough to enjoy Dusty properly but with Duffy, i'll definately go and see this gal live!!!!!!!!!!!

What!? 

Mar 17, 2008

Rather listen to this girl than the pile of crap being peddled in NME recently. Foals?!!? The Black Kids?!?! Rubbish, just coz she is popular!! Tut Tut!

FRANCOPHONE 

Mar 19, 2008

Ha ha..My Muggles confirms what this review points out so well "..so pleased that we have a talented person out there who sings Jazzy songs that doesn't get involved in rehab.." Exactly what the Duffy prepackage is there for mate...Amy scare's ya? Here you go then here's Duffy, you can play this one at yer dinner party after Dido...loving it loving it;) By the way, didn't Duffy's stylist nick like everything off blonde french babe Vanessa from James Ih'a new band Vanessa & the O's? Pretty dure young Duffers didn't look like that on XFactor eh? Have a look here> myspace.com/vanessaandtheos

Charl2thebrown 

Apr 2, 2008

Big slap for Winehouse.You can be talented & not be trash.Love it.

sim_simmah 

Apr 6, 2008

I agree that this album is not particularly brilliant, but it is very easy and pleasant to listen to, and I still can't believe that NME could bring itself to award the courteneers even one point out of ten for their absolutely shocking new album. Don't even get me started on the Teenagers!

Mrs. God 

Apr 8, 2008

Duffy sucks!!! Winehouse is the real deal. She says the things other singers wouldn't dream of saying. She's the legend, not Duffy. Amy's voice make Duffy look plastic.

RuiRuiRuiRui 

Apr 11, 2008

This is, even by the NME's standards, one of the worst pieces of writing I've ever read. What a complete load of rubbish - so what if she's slightly 'manufactured'? The NME have given Girls Aloud ratings at high at 8/10 for previous albums, so why not do the same with this record - judge it on its merits, rather than to sound alternative.

Soundedd 

Apr 21, 2008

Pathetic, why oh why are Arctics, Kaisers, Pigeons, Wombats etc being mentioned, every review someone has to mention them. I will attack the fools slating them however, if you are so narrow minded that you thin every band is a rip off of Arctics to be hoenst, your not worth arguing. All of the above are class proper guitar bands, it's the shite like Ting Tings, Joe Lean, Cajun Dance Party, Foals and all these crap bands that NME shouldn't be bigging up. World class talent like Kaisers deserve it anyway This is a review about a hugely talented welsh soul singer who has delivered a dream of an album, forget Winehouse the druggie, this is pure music at it's best, top album 5 star.

Pinkfruit 

May 28, 2008

Nearly everyone's written shit loads of stuff.I just wanted ot say.. She's awesome ;)

Add your comment

NME Alerts

Get NME news delivered direct to your desktop. Find out more

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Register with MyNME

Every Tuesday and Friday

  • Up-to-the-minute news stories
  • The best new music and free downloads
  • Video interviews, photo galleries, competitions and more
  • Album and track reviews for the week ahead
  • Essential gigs in your area